# HG changeset patch
# User Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
# Date 1313092206 21600
# Node ID cf26fcc97d8580897c0293a42d6eee207971630a
# Parent  937214896458d311aeaf5d52d50e2c1008facdca
minor ref rpt stuff

diff -r 937214896458 -r cf26fcc97d85 RefereeReport.pdf
Binary file RefereeReport.pdf has changed
diff -r 937214896458 -r cf26fcc97d85 text/deligne.tex
--- a/text/deligne.tex	Thu Aug 11 12:59:06 2011 -0600
+++ b/text/deligne.tex	Thu Aug 11 13:50:06 2011 -0600
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
 We have now defined a map from the little $n{+}1$-balls operad to the $n$-SC operad,
 with contractible fibers.
 (The fibers correspond to moving the $D_i$'s in the $x_{n+1}$ 
-direction without changing their ordering.)
+direction while keeping them disjoint.)
 %\nn{issue: we've described this by varying the $R_i$'s, but above we emphasize varying the $f_i$'s.
 %does this need more explanation?}
 
diff -r 937214896458 -r cf26fcc97d85 text/ncat.tex
--- a/text/ncat.tex	Thu Aug 11 12:59:06 2011 -0600
+++ b/text/ncat.tex	Thu Aug 11 13:50:06 2011 -0600
@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@
 associated to $L$ by $\cX$ and $\cC$.
 (See \S \ref{ss:ncat_fields} and \S \ref{moddecss}.)
 Define $\cl{\cY}(L)$ similarly.
-For $K$ an unmarked 1-ball let $\cl{\cC(K)}$ denote the local homotopy colimit
+For $K$ an unmarked 1-ball let $\cl{\cC}(K)$ denote the local homotopy colimit
 construction associated to $K$ by $\cC$.
 Then we have an injective gluing map
 \[
@@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@
 We only consider those decompositions in which the smaller balls are either
 $0$-marked (i.e. intersect the $0$-marking of the large ball in a disc) 
 or plain (don't intersect the $0$-marking of the large ball).
-We can also take the boundary of a $0$-marked ball, which is $0$-marked sphere.
+We can also take the boundary of a $0$-marked ball, which is a $0$-marked sphere.
 
 Fix $n$-categories $\cA$ and $\cB$.
 These will label the two halves of a $0$-marked $k$-ball.
@@ -2618,7 +2618,6 @@
 \caption{Moving $B$ from bottom to top}
 \label{jun23c}
 \end{figure}
-Let $D' = B\cap C$.
 It is not hard too show that the above two maps are mutually inverse.
 
 \begin{lem} \label{equator-lemma}