# HG changeset patch # User Kevin Walker # Date 1308244301 21600 # Node ID d30537de52c7248d47959728815e80f7d1cc016f # Parent 4d66ffe8dc85885ad5526eec8f993dc1c7b8641b in the midst of revising a-inf and enriched n-cat axioms; not done yet diff -r 4d66ffe8dc85 -r d30537de52c7 blob to-do --- a/blob to-do Thu Jun 16 08:51:40 2011 -0600 +++ b/blob to-do Thu Jun 16 11:11:41 2011 -0600 @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ * consider proving the gluing formula for higher codimension manifolds with morita equivalence +* leftover: we used to require that composition of A-infinity n-morphisms was injective (just like lower morphisms). Should we stick this back in? I don't think we use it anywhere. + * SCOTT will go through appendix C.2 and make it better diff -r 4d66ffe8dc85 -r d30537de52c7 text/ncat.tex --- a/text/ncat.tex Thu Jun 16 08:51:40 2011 -0600 +++ b/text/ncat.tex Thu Jun 16 11:11:41 2011 -0600 @@ -719,39 +719,33 @@ \end{itemize} \end{axiom} - - - -\nn{a-inf starts by enriching over inf-cat; maybe simple version first, then peter's version (attrib to peter)} +\medskip -\nn{blarg} - -\nn{$k=n$ injectivity for a-inf (necessary?)} -or if $k=n$ and we are in the $A_\infty$ case, +When the enriching category $\cS$ is chain complexes or topological spaces, +or more generally an appropriate sort of $\infty$-category, +we can modify the extended isotopy axiom \ref{axiom:extended-isotopies} +to require that families of homeomorphisms act +and obtain an $A_\infty$ $n$-category. - -\nn{resume revising here} - +We believe that abstract definitions should be guided by diverse collections +of concrete examples, and a lack of diversity in our present collection of examples of $A_\infty$ $n$-categories +makes us reluctant to commit to an all-encompassing general definition. +Instead, we will give a relatively narrow definition which covers the examples we consider in this paper. +After stating it, we will briefly discuss ways in which it can be made more general. -\smallskip - -For $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, we replace -isotopy invariance with the requirement that families of homeomorphisms act. -For the moment, assume that our $n$-morphisms are enriched over chain complexes. +Assume that our $n$-morphisms are enriched over chain complexes. Let $\Homeo_\bd(X)$ denote homeomorphisms of $X$ which fix $\bd X$ and $C_*(\Homeo_\bd(X))$ denote the singular chains on this space. - +\nn{need to loosen for bbc reasons} -%\addtocounter{axiom}{-1} \begin{axiom}[\textup{\textbf{[$A_\infty$ version]}} Families of homeomorphisms act in dimension $n$.] \label{axiom:families} For each $n$-ball $X$ and each $c\in \cl{\cC}(\bd X)$ we have a map of chain complexes \[ C_*(\Homeo_\bd(X))\ot \cC(X; c) \to \cC(X; c) . \] -These action maps are required to be associative up to homotopy, -%\nn{iterated homotopy?} +These action maps are required to be associative up to coherent homotopy, and also compatible with composition (gluing) in the sense that a diagram like the one in Theorem \ref{thm:CH} commutes. %\nn{repeat diagram here?} @@ -768,7 +762,10 @@ weak identities. We will not pursue this in detail here. -A potential variant on the above axiom would be to drop the ``up to homotopy" and require a strictly associative action. (In fact, the alternative construction of the blob complex described in \S \ref{ss:alt-def} gives $n$-categories as in Example \ref{ex:blob-complexes-of-balls} which satisfy this stronger axiom; since that construction is only homotopy equivalent to the usual one, only the weaker axiom carries across.) +One potential variant of the above axiom would be to drop the ``up to homotopy" and require a strictly associative action. +(In fact, the alternative construction of the blob complex described in \S \ref{ss:alt-def} +gives $n$-categories as in Example \ref{ex:blob-complexes-of-balls} which satisfy this stronger axiom; +since that construction is only homotopy equivalent to the usual one, only the weaker axiom carries across.) Note that if we take homology of chain complexes, we turn an $A_\infty$ $n$-category into a ordinary $n$-category (enriched over graded groups). @@ -778,6 +775,16 @@ Taking singular chains converts such a space type $A_\infty$ $n$-category into a chain complex type $A_\infty$ $n$-category. +One possibility for generalizing the above axiom to encompass a wider variety of examples goes as follows. +(Credit for these ideas goes to Peter Teichner, but of course the blame for any flaws goes to us.) +Let $\cS$ be an $A_\infty$ 1-category. +(We assume some prior notion of $A_\infty$ 1-category.) +Note that the category $\cB\cB\cC$ of balls with boundary conditions, defined above, is enriched in the category +of topological spaces, and hence can also be regarded as an $A_\infty$ 1-category. +\nn{...} + + + \medskip We define a $j$ times monoidal $n$-category to be an $(n{+}j)$-category $\cC$ where