# HG changeset patch # User Scott Morrison # Date 1323746817 28800 # Node ID 0dbaf072e9162e43cd30cc08913980b93c7cf40f # Parent 87bfea2e3150996cd9055f359d5ca0f543afd352# Parent d875a8378d83468683f0c3b5fd21cd4f62eb1d24 Automated merge with https://tqft.net/hg/blob diff -r d875a8378d83 -r 0dbaf072e916 blob to-do --- a/blob to-do Mon Dec 12 19:26:44 2011 -0800 +++ b/blob to-do Mon Dec 12 19:26:57 2011 -0800 @@ -1,16 +1,13 @@ ====== big ====== -* add "homeomorphism" spiel befure the first use of "homeomorphism in the intro -* maybe also additional homeo warnings in other sections - -* Lemma 3.2.3 (\ref{support-shrink}) implicitly assumes embedded (non-self-intersecting) blobs. this can be fixed, of course, but it makes the argument more difficult to understand - -* Maybe give more details in 6.7.2 +[nothing!] ====== minor/optional ====== +* Maybe give more details in 6.7.2. Or maybe do this in some future paper. + [probably NO] * consider proving the gluing formula for higher codimension manifolds with morita equivalence diff -r d875a8378d83 -r 0dbaf072e916 text/basic_properties.tex --- a/text/basic_properties.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:44 2011 -0800 +++ b/text/basic_properties.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:57 2011 -0800 @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ For $y \in \bc_*(X)$ with $y = \sum c_i b_i$ ($c_i$ a non-zero number, $b_i$ a blob diagram), we define $\supp(y) \deq \bigcup_i \supp(b_i)$. +%%%%% the following is true in spirit, but technically incorrect if blobs are not embedded; +%%%%% we only use this once, so move lemma and proof to Hochschild section +\noop{ %%%%%%%%%% begin \noop For future use we prove the following lemma. \begin{lemma} \label{support-shrink} @@ -94,6 +97,7 @@ Both $f$ and the identity are compatible with $T$ (in the sense of acyclic models, \S\ref{sec:moam}), so $f$ and the identity map are homotopic. \end{proof} +} %%%%%%%%%%%%% end \noop For the next proposition we will temporarily restore $n$-manifold boundary conditions to the notation. Let $X$ be an $n$-manifold, with $\bd X = Y \cup Y \cup Z$. diff -r d875a8378d83 -r 0dbaf072e916 text/hochschild.tex --- a/text/hochschild.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:44 2011 -0800 +++ b/text/hochschild.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:57 2011 -0800 @@ -218,7 +218,10 @@ to distance $\ep$ from *. (Move right or left so as to shrink the blob.) Extend to get a chain map $f: F_*^\ep \to F_*^\ep$. -By Lemma \ref{support-shrink}, $f$ is homotopic to the identity. +By Corollary \ref{disj-union-contract}, +$f$ is homotopic to the identity. +(Use the facts that $f$ factors though a map from a disjoint union of balls +into $S^1$, and that $f$ is the identity in degree 0.) Since the image of $f$ is in $J_*$, and since any blob chain is in $F_*^\ep$ for $\ep$ sufficiently small, we have that $J_*$ is homotopic to all of $\bc_*(S^1)$. diff -r d875a8378d83 -r 0dbaf072e916 text/intro.tex --- a/text/intro.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:44 2011 -0800 +++ b/text/intro.tex Mon Dec 12 19:26:57 2011 -0800 @@ -43,6 +43,16 @@ with sufficient limits and colimits would do. We could also replace many of our chain complexes with topological spaces (or indeed, work at the generality of model categories). +{\bf Note:} For simplicity, we will assume that all manifolds are unoriented and piecewise linear, unless stated otherwise. +In fact, all the results in this paper also hold for smooth manifolds, +as well as manifolds equipped with an orientation, spin structure, or $\mathrm{Pin}_\pm$ structure. +We will use ``homeomorphism" as a shorthand for ``piecewise linear homeomorphism". +The reader could also interpret ``homeomorphism" to mean an isomorphism in whatever category of manifolds we happen to +be working in (e.g.\ spin piecewise linear, oriented smooth, etc.). +In the smooth case there are additional technical details concerning corners and gluing +which we have omitted, since +most of the examples we are interested in require only a piecewise linear structure. + \subsection{Structure of the paper} The subsections of the introduction explain our motivations in defining the blob complex (see \S \ref{sec:motivations}),