# HG changeset patch # User Scott Morrison # Date 1289353229 -32400 # Node ID 37774cf92851eeb2b57dc7e4510faa66a5ba6238 # Parent e1840aaa31ffdc019adb0c87e0b974c1c3df50cc# Parent 9c708975b61b1ed3d0005ff3bf25c2743ab4a0f3 Automated merge with https://tqft.net/hg/blob/ diff -r e1840aaa31ff -r 37774cf92851 pnas/pnas.tex --- a/pnas/pnas.tex Mon Nov 08 10:23:10 2010 +0900 +++ b/pnas/pnas.tex Wed Nov 10 10:40:29 2010 +0900 @@ -226,11 +226,8 @@ Note that the functoriality in the above axiom allows us to operate via homeomorphisms which are not the identity on the boundary of the $k$-ball. The action of these homeomorphisms gives the ``strong duality" structure. - -Next we consider domains and ranges of $k$-morphisms. -Because we assume strong duality, it doesn't make much sense to subdivide the boundary of a morphism -into domain and range --- the duality operations can convert domain to range and vice-versa. -Instead, we will use a unified domain/range, which we will call a ``boundary". +As such, we don't subdivide the boundary of a morphism +into domain and range --- the duality operations can convert between domain and range. Later \todo{} we inductively define an extension of the functors $\cC_k$ to functors $\cl{\cC}_k$ from arbitrary manifolds to sets. We need the restriction of these functors to $k$-spheres, for $k