text/A-infty.tex
author scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:06:04 +0000
changeset 55 2625a6f51684
child 56 82eadbcef096
permissions -rw-r--r--
...
Ignore whitespace changes - Everywhere: Within whitespace: At end of lines:
55
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     1
\section{Homological systems of fields}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     2
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     3
In this section, we extend the definition of blob homology to allow \emph{homological systems of fields}.
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     4
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     5
We begin with a definition of a \emph{topological $A_\infty$ category}, and then introduce the notion of a homological system of fields. A topological $A_\infty$ category gives a $1$-dimensional homological system of fields. We'll suggest that any good definition of a topological $A_\infty$ $n$-category with duals should allow construction of an $n$-dimensional homological system of fields, but we won't propose any such definition here. Later, we extend the definition of blob homology to allow homological fields as input. These definitions allow us to state and prove a theorem about the blob homology of a product manifold, and an intermediate theorem about gluing, in preparation for the proof of \ref{thm:gluing}.
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     6
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     7
\begin{defn}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     8
A \emph{topological $A_\infty$ category $\cC$} has a set of objects $\Obj(\cC)$ and for each $a,b \in \Obj(\cC)$, a chain complex $\cC_{a,b}$, along with a compatible `composition map' and `action of families of diffeomorphisms'.
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
     9
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    10
A \emph{decomposition of the interval} is a collection of disjoint subintervals $\{(a_i,b_i)\}_{i=1}^k$ of $[0,1]$, along with a labeling of the complementary regions by objects of $\cC$, $\{o_0, \ldots, o_k\}$. A \emph{composition map} is a family of chain maps, one for each decomposition of the interval, $f_\cJ : A^k \to A$. Given two decompositions $\cJ_1$ and $\cJ_2$, and an index $m$ such that $o^{(1)}_{m-1} = o^{(2)}_0$ and $o^{(1)}_{m} = o^{(2)}_{k^{(2)}}$, we can form a new decomposition by inserting the intervals of $\cJ_2$ linearly inside the $m$-th interval of $\cJ_1$. We call the resulting decomposition$\cJ_1 \circ_m \cJ_2$. We insist that
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    11
\begin{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    12
f_{\cJ_1 \circ_m \cJ_2} = f_{\cJ_1} \circ (\id^{\tensor m-1} \tensor f_{\cJ_2} \tensor \id^{\tensor k^{(1)} - m}).
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    13
\end{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    14
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    15
An \emph{action of families of diffeomorphisms} is a chain map $C_*(Diff([0,1])) \tensor A \to A$, such that \todo{What goes here, if anything?} 
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    16
\end{defn}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    17
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    18
From a topological $A_\infty$ category $\cC$ we can produce a `conventional' $A_\infty$ category $(A, \{m_k\})$ as defined in, for example, \cite{Keller}. We'll just describe the algebra case (that is, a category with only one object), as the modifications required to deal with multiple objects are trivial. Define $A = \cC$ as a chain complex (so $m_1 = d$). Define $m_2 : A\tensor A \to A$ by $f_{\{(0,\frac{1}{2}),(\frac{1}{2},1)\}}$. To define $m_3$, we begin by taking the one parameter family of diffeomorphisms of $[0,1]$ $\phi_3$ that interpolates linearly between the identity and the piecewise linear diffeomorphism taking $\frac{1}{4}$ to $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ to $\frac{3}{4}$, and then define
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    19
\begin{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    20
m_3(a,b,c) = ev(\phi_3, m_2(m_2(a,b), c))
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    21
\end{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    22
\todo{Explain why this works, then the general case.}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    23
We won't describe a reverse construction (producing a topological $A_\infty$ category from a `conventional' $A_\infty$ category), but we presume that this will be easy for the experts.
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    24
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    25
\begin{thm}[Product formula]
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    26
Suppose $M = B \times F$ is a trivial bundle with $b$-dimensional base $B$ and $f$-dimensional fiber $F$. The blob homology of $M$ can be computed as
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    27
\begin{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    28
\cB_*(M, \cF) = \cB_*(B, \cB_*(F, \cF)).
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    29
\end{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    30
On the right hand side, $\cB_*(F, \cF)$ means the homological system of fields constructed from the $A_\infty$ $b$-category $\cB_*(F \times [0,1]^b, \cF)$.
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    31
\end{thm}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    32
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    33
\begin{question}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    34
Is it possible to compute the blob homology of a non-trivial bundle in terms of the blob homology of its fiber?
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    35
\end{question}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    36
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    37
\begin{thm}[Gluing, intermediate form]
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    38
Suppose $M = M_1 \cup_Y M_2$ is the union of two submanifolds $M_1$ and $M_2$ along a codimension $1$ manifold $Y$. The blob homology of $M$ can be computed as
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    39
\begin{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    40
\cB_*(M, \cF) = \cB_*(([0,1], \{0\}, \{1\}), (\cB_*(Y, \cF), \cB_*(M_1, \cF), \cB_*(M_2, \cF))).
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    41
\end{equation*}
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    42
The right hand side is the blob homology of the interval, using ...
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
diff changeset
    43
\end{thm}