author | Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net> |
Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:45 -0600 | |
changeset 274 | 8e021128cf8f |
parent 273 | ec9458975d92 |
child 275 | 81d7c550b3da |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
169 | 1 |
%!TEX root = ../../blob1.tex |
98 | 2 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
3 |
\section{Adapting families of maps to open covers} \label{sec:localising} |
98 | 4 |
|
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
5 |
|
272 | 6 |
Let $X$ and $T$ be topological spaces, with $X$ compact. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
7 |
Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$ which affords a partition of |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
8 |
unity $\{r_\alpha\}$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
9 |
(That is, $r_\alpha : X \to [0,1]$; $r_\alpha(x) = 0$ if $x\notin U_\alpha$; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
10 |
for fixed $x$, $r_\alpha(x) \ne 0$ for only finitely many $\alpha$; and $\sum_\alpha r_\alpha = 1$.) |
272 | 11 |
Since $X$ is compact, we will further assume that $r_\alpha \ne 0$ (globally) |
12 |
for only finitely |
|
13 |
many $\alpha$. |
|
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
14 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
15 |
Let |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
16 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
17 |
CM_*(X, T) \deq C_*(\Maps(X\to T)) , |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
18 |
\] |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
19 |
the singular chains on the space of continuous maps from $X$ to $T$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
20 |
$CM_k(X, T)$ is generated by continuous maps |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
21 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
22 |
f: P\times X \to T , |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
23 |
\] |
272 | 24 |
where $P$ is some convex linear polyhedron in $\r^k$. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
25 |
Recall that $f$ is {\it supported} on $S\sub X$ if $f(p, x)$ does not depend on $p$ when |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
26 |
$x \notin S$, and that $f$ is {\it adapted} to $\cU$ if |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
27 |
$f$ is supported on the union of at most $k$ of the $U_\alpha$'s. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
28 |
A chain $c \in CM_*(X, T)$ is adapted to $\cU$ if it is a linear combination of |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
29 |
generators which are adapted. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
30 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
31 |
\begin{lemma} \label{basic_adaptation_lemma} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
32 |
The $f: P\times X \to T$, as above. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
33 |
The there exists |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
34 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
35 |
F: I \times P\times X \to T |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
36 |
\] |
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
37 |
such that |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
38 |
\begin{enumerate} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
39 |
\item $F(0, \cdot, \cdot) = f$ . |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
40 |
\item We can decompose $P = \cup_i D_i$ so that |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
41 |
the restrictions $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D_i\times X\to T$ are all adapted to $\cU$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
42 |
\item If $f$ restricted to $Q\sub P$ has support $S\sub X$, then the restriction |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
43 |
$F: (I\times Q)\times X\to T$ also has support $S$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
44 |
\item If for all $p\in P$ we have $f(p, \cdot):X\to T$ is a |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
45 |
[submersion, diffeomorphism, PL homeomorphism, bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism] |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
46 |
then the same is true of $F(t, p, \cdot)$ for all $t\in I$ and $p\in P$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
47 |
(Of course we must assume that $X$ and $T$ are the appropriate |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
48 |
sort of manifolds for this to make sense.) |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
49 |
\end{enumerate} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
50 |
\end{lemma} |
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
51 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
52 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
53 |
|
194 | 54 |
\begin{proof} |
98 | 55 |
Our homotopy will have the form |
56 |
\eqar{ |
|
57 |
F: I \times P \times X &\to& X \\ |
|
58 |
(t, p, x) &\mapsto& f(u(t, p, x), x) |
|
59 |
} |
|
60 |
for some function |
|
61 |
\eq{ |
|
62 |
u : I \times P \times X \to P . |
|
63 |
} |
|
272 | 64 |
|
65 |
First we describe $u$, then we argue that it makes the conclusions of the lemma true. |
|
98 | 66 |
|
272 | 67 |
For each cover index $\alpha$ choose a cell decomposition $K_\alpha$ of $P$ |
68 |
such that the various $K_\alpha$ are in general position with respect to each other. |
|
69 |
If we are in one of the cases of item 4 of the lemma, also choose $K_\alpha$ |
|
70 |
sufficiently fine as described below. |
|
98 | 71 |
|
272 | 72 |
\def\jj{\tilde{L}} |
73 |
Let $L$ be a common refinement all the $K_\alpha$'s. |
|
74 |
Let $\jj$ denote the handle decomposition of $P$ corresponding to $L$. |
|
75 |
Each $i$-handle $C$ of $\jj$ has an $i$-dimensional tangential coordinate and, |
|
76 |
more importantly for our purposes, a $k{-}i$-dimensional normal coordinate. |
|
77 |
We will typically use the same notation for $i$-cells of $L$ and the |
|
78 |
corresponding $i$-handles of $\jj$. |
|
98 | 79 |
|
273 | 80 |
For each (top-dimensional) $k$-cell $C$ of each $K_\alpha$, choose a point $p(C) \in C \sub P$. |
272 | 81 |
Let $D$ be a $k$-handle of $\jj$. |
273 | 82 |
For each $\alpha$ let $C(D, \alpha)$ be the $k$-cell of $K_\alpha$ which contains $D$ |
83 |
and let $p(D, \alpha) = p(C(D, \alpha))$. |
|
98 | 84 |
|
85 |
For $p \in D$ we define |
|
86 |
\eq{ |
|
273 | 87 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \sum_\alpha r_\alpha(x) p(D, \alpha) . |
98 | 88 |
} |
272 | 89 |
(Recall that $P$ is a convex linear polyhedron, so the weighted average of points of $P$ |
98 | 90 |
makes sense.) |
91 |
||
273 | 92 |
Thus far we have defined $u(t, p, x)$ when $p$ lies in a $k$-handle of $\jj$. |
93 |
We will now extend $u$ inductively to handles of index less than $k$. |
|
94 |
||
95 |
Let $E$ be a $k{-}1$-handle. |
|
96 |
$E$ is homeomorphic to $B^{k-1}\times [0,1]$, and meets |
|
97 |
the $k$-handles at $B^{k-1}\times\{0\}$ and $B^{k-1}\times\{1\}$. |
|
98 |
Let $\eta : E \to [0,1]$, $\eta(x, s) = s$ be the normal coordinate |
|
99 |
of $E$. |
|
100 |
Let $D_0$ and $D_1$ be the two $k$-handles of $\jj$ adjacent to $E$. |
|
101 |
There is at most one index $\beta$ such that $C(D_0, \beta) \ne C(D_1, \beta)$. |
|
274 | 102 |
(If there is no such index, choose $\beta$ |
273 | 103 |
arbitrarily.) |
104 |
For $p \in E$, define |
|
105 |
\eq{ |
|
106 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \left( \sum_{\alpha \ne \beta} r_\alpha(x) p(D_0, \alpha) |
|
107 |
+ r_\beta(x) (\eta(p) p(D_0, p) + (1-\eta(p)) p(D_1, p)) \right) . |
|
108 |
} |
|
98 | 109 |
|
272 | 110 |
|
274 | 111 |
Now for the general case. |
112 |
Let $E$ be a $k{-}j$-handle. |
|
113 |
Let $D_0,\ldots,D_a$ be the $k$-handles adjacent to $E$. |
|
114 |
There is a subset of cover indices $\cN$, of cardinality $j$, |
|
115 |
such that if $\alpha\notin\cN$ then |
|
116 |
$p(D_u, \alpha) = p(D_v, \alpha)$ for all $0\le u,v \le a$. |
|
117 |
For fixed $\beta\in\cN$ let $\{q_{\beta i}\}$ be the set of values of |
|
118 |
$p(D_u, \beta)$ for $0\le u \le a$. |
|
119 |
Recall the product structure $E = B^{k-j}\times B^j$. |
|
120 |
Inductively, we have defined functions $\eta_{\beta i}:\bd B^j \to [0,1]$ such that |
|
121 |
$\sum_i \eta_{\beta i} = 1$ for all $\beta\in \cN$. |
|
122 |
Choose extensions of $\eta_{\beta i}$ to all of $B^j$. |
|
123 |
Via the projection $E\to B^j$, regard $\eta_{\beta i}$ as a function on $E$. |
|
98 | 124 |
Now define, for $p \in E$, |
194 | 125 |
\begin{equation} |
126 |
\label{eq:u} |
|
98 | 127 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \left( |
128 |
\sum_{\alpha \notin \cN} r_\alpha(x) p_{c_\alpha} |
|
129 |
+ \sum_{\beta \in \cN} r_\beta(x) \left( \sum_i \eta_{\beta i}(p) \cdot q_{\beta i} \right) |
|
130 |
\right) . |
|
194 | 131 |
\end{equation} |
98 | 132 |
|
133 |
This completes the definition of $u: I \times P \times X \to P$. |
|
134 |
||
135 |
\medskip |
|
136 |
||
274 | 137 |
Next we verify that $u$ affords $F$ the properties claimed in the statement of the lemma. |
98 | 138 |
|
139 |
Since $u(0, p, x) = p$ for all $p\in P$ and $x\in X$, $F(0, p, x) = f(p, x)$ for all $p$ and $x$. |
|
140 |
Therefore $F$ is a homotopy from $f$ to something. |
|
141 |
||
274 | 142 |
\nn{*** resume revising here ***} |
143 |
||
98 | 144 |
Next we show that if the $K_\alpha$'s are sufficiently fine cell decompositions, |
145 |
then $F$ is a homotopy through diffeomorphisms. |
|
146 |
We must show that the derivative $\pd{F}{x}(t, p, x)$ is non-singular for all $(t, p, x)$. |
|
147 |
We have |
|
148 |
\eq{ |
|
149 |
% \pd{F}{x}(t, p, x) = \pd{f}{x}(u(t, p, x), x) + \pd{f}{p}(u(t, p, x), x) \pd{u}{x}(t, p, x) . |
|
150 |
\pd{F}{x} = \pd{f}{x} + \pd{f}{p} \pd{u}{x} . |
|
151 |
} |
|
152 |
Since $f$ is a family of diffeomorphisms, $\pd{f}{x}$ is non-singular and |
|
153 |
\nn{bounded away from zero, or something like that}. |
|
154 |
(Recall that $X$ and $P$ are compact.) |
|
155 |
Also, $\pd{f}{p}$ is bounded. |
|
156 |
So if we can insure that $\pd{u}{x}$ is sufficiently small, we are done. |
|
194 | 157 |
It follows from Equation \eqref{eq:u} above that $\pd{u}{x}$ depends on $\pd{r_\alpha}{x}$ |
98 | 158 |
(which is bounded) |
159 |
and the differences amongst the various $p_{c_\alpha}$'s and $q_{\beta i}$'s. |
|
160 |
These differences are small if the cell decompositions $K_\alpha$ are sufficiently fine. |
|
161 |
This completes the proof that $F$ is a homotopy through diffeomorphisms. |
|
162 |
||
163 |
\medskip |
|
164 |
||
165 |
Next we show that for each handle $D \sub P$, $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D\times X \to X$ |
|
166 |
is a singular cell adapted to $\cU$. |
|
167 |
This will complete the proof of the lemma. |
|
168 |
\nn{except for boundary issues and the `$P$ is a cell' assumption} |
|
169 |
||
170 |
Let $j$ be the codimension of $D$. |
|
171 |
(Or rather, the codimension of its corresponding cell. From now on we will not make a distinction |
|
172 |
between handle and corresponding cell.) |
|
173 |
Then $j = j_1 + \cdots + j_m$, $0 \le m \le k$, |
|
174 |
where the $j_i$'s are the codimensions of the $K_\alpha$ |
|
175 |
cells of codimension greater than 0 which intersect to form $D$. |
|
176 |
We will show that |
|
177 |
if the relevant $U_\alpha$'s are disjoint, then |
|
178 |
$F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D\times X \to X$ |
|
179 |
is a product of singular cells of dimensions $j_1, \ldots, j_m$. |
|
180 |
If some of the relevant $U_\alpha$'s intersect, then we will get a product of singular |
|
181 |
cells whose dimensions correspond to a partition of the $j_i$'s. |
|
182 |
We will consider some simple special cases first, then do the general case. |
|
183 |
||
184 |
First consider the case $j=0$ (and $m=0$). |
|
185 |
A quick look at Equation xxxx above shows that $u(1, p, x)$, and hence $F(1, p, x)$, |
|
186 |
is independent of $p \in P$. |
|
187 |
So the corresponding map $D \to \Diff(X)$ is constant. |
|
188 |
||
189 |
Next consider the case $j = 1$ (and $m=1$, $j_1=1$). |
|
190 |
Now Equation yyyy applies. |
|
191 |
We can write $D = D'\times I$, where the normal coordinate $\eta$ is constant on $D'$. |
|
192 |
It follows that the singular cell $D \to \Diff(X)$ can be written as a product |
|
193 |
of a constant map $D' \to \Diff(X)$ and a singular 1-cell $I \to \Diff(X)$. |
|
194 |
The singular 1-cell is supported on $U_\beta$, since $r_\beta = 0$ outside of this set. |
|
195 |
||
196 |
Next case: $j=2$, $m=1$, $j_1 = 2$. |
|
197 |
This is similar to the previous case, except that the normal bundle is 2-dimensional instead of |
|
198 |
1-dimensional. |
|
199 |
We have that $D \to \Diff(X)$ is a product of a constant singular $k{-}2$-cell |
|
200 |
and a 2-cell with support $U_\beta$. |
|
201 |
||
202 |
Next case: $j=2$, $m=2$, $j_1 = j_2 = 1$. |
|
203 |
In this case the codimension 2 cell $D$ is the intersection of two |
|
204 |
codimension 1 cells, from $K_\beta$ and $K_\gamma$. |
|
205 |
We can write $D = D' \times I \times I$, where the normal coordinates are constant |
|
206 |
on $D'$, and the two $I$ factors correspond to $\beta$ and $\gamma$. |
|
207 |
If $U_\beta$ and $U_\gamma$ are disjoint, then we can factor $D$ into a constant $k{-}2$-cell and |
|
208 |
two 1-cells, supported on $U_\beta$ and $U_\gamma$ respectively. |
|
209 |
If $U_\beta$ and $U_\gamma$ intersect, then we can factor $D$ into a constant $k{-}2$-cell and |
|
210 |
a 2-cell supported on $U_\beta \cup U_\gamma$. |
|
211 |
\nn{need to check that this is true} |
|
212 |
||
213 |
\nn{finally, general case...} |
|
214 |
||
215 |
\nn{this completes proof} |
|
216 |
||
194 | 217 |
\end{proof} |
98 | 218 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
219 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
220 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
221 |
|
272 | 222 |
\noop{ |
223 |
||
224 |
\nn{move this to later:} |
|
225 |
||
226 |
\begin{lemma} \label{extension_lemma_b} |
|
227 |
Let $x \in CM_k(X, T)$ be a singular chain such that $\bd x$ is adapted to $\cU$. |
|
228 |
Then $x$ is homotopic (rel boundary) to some $x' \in CM_k(S, T)$ which is adapted to $\cU$. |
|
229 |
Furthermore, one can choose the homotopy so that its support is equal to the support of $x$. |
|
230 |
If $S$ and $T$ are manifolds, the statement remains true if we replace $CM_*(S, T)$ with |
|
231 |
chains of smooth maps or immersions. |
|
232 |
\end{lemma} |
|
233 |
||
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
234 |
\medskip |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
235 |
\hrule |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
236 |
\medskip |
272 | 237 |
|
238 |
||
239 |
In this appendix we provide the proof of |
|
240 |
\nn{should change this to the more general \ref{extension_lemma_b}} |
|
241 |
||
242 |
\begin{lem*}[Restatement of Lemma \ref{extension_lemma}] |
|
243 |
Let $x \in CD_k(X)$ be a singular chain such that $\bd x$ is adapted to $\cU$. |
|
244 |
Then $x$ is homotopic (rel boundary) to some $x' \in CD_k(X)$ which is adapted to $\cU$. |
|
245 |
Furthermore, one can choose the homotopy so that its support is equal to the support of $x$. |
|
246 |
\end{lem*} |
|
247 |
||
248 |
\nn{for pedagogical reasons, should do $k=1,2$ cases first; probably do this in |
|
249 |
later draft} |
|
250 |
||
251 |
\nn{not sure what the best way to deal with boundary is; for now just give main argument, worry |
|
252 |
about boundary later} |
|
253 |
||
254 |
} |
|
255 |
||
256 |
||
257 |
||
258 |
||
259 |
\medskip |
|
260 |
\hrule |
|
261 |
\medskip |
|
262 |
\nn{the following was removed from earlier section; it should be reincorporated somewhere |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
263 |
in this section} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
264 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
265 |
Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
266 |
A $k$-parameter family of homeomorphisms $f: P \times X \to X$ is |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
267 |
{\it adapted to $\cU$} if there is a factorization |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
268 |
\eq{ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
269 |
P = P_1 \times \cdots \times P_m |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
270 |
} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
271 |
(for some $m \le k$) |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
272 |
and families of homeomorphisms |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
273 |
\eq{ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
274 |
f_i : P_i \times X \to X |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
275 |
} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
276 |
such that |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
277 |
\begin{itemize} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
278 |
\item each $f_i$ is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
279 |
\item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
280 |
\item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s, |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
281 |
where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
282 |
\item $f(p, \cdot) = g \circ f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot)$ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
283 |
for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g \in \Homeo(X)$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
284 |
\end{itemize} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
285 |
A chain $x \in CH_k(X)$ is (by definition) adapted to $\cU$ if it is the sum |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
286 |
of singular cells, each of which is adapted to $\cU$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
287 |
\medskip |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
288 |
\hrule |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
289 |
\medskip |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
290 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
291 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
292 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
293 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
294 |
|
194 | 295 |
\input{text/appendixes/explicit.tex} |
296 |