author | Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net> |
Tue, 25 May 2010 07:26:36 -0700 | |
changeset 277 | ba4ddbc41c15 |
parent 276 | 7a67f45e2475 |
child 278 | 79f7b1bd7b1a |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
169 | 1 |
%!TEX root = ../../blob1.tex |
98 | 2 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
3 |
\section{Adapting families of maps to open covers} \label{sec:localising} |
98 | 4 |
|
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
5 |
|
272 | 6 |
Let $X$ and $T$ be topological spaces, with $X$ compact. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
7 |
Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$ which affords a partition of |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
8 |
unity $\{r_\alpha\}$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
9 |
(That is, $r_\alpha : X \to [0,1]$; $r_\alpha(x) = 0$ if $x\notin U_\alpha$; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
10 |
for fixed $x$, $r_\alpha(x) \ne 0$ for only finitely many $\alpha$; and $\sum_\alpha r_\alpha = 1$.) |
272 | 11 |
Since $X$ is compact, we will further assume that $r_\alpha \ne 0$ (globally) |
12 |
for only finitely |
|
13 |
many $\alpha$. |
|
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
14 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
15 |
Let |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
16 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
17 |
CM_*(X, T) \deq C_*(\Maps(X\to T)) , |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
18 |
\] |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
19 |
the singular chains on the space of continuous maps from $X$ to $T$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
20 |
$CM_k(X, T)$ is generated by continuous maps |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
21 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
22 |
f: P\times X \to T , |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
23 |
\] |
272 | 24 |
where $P$ is some convex linear polyhedron in $\r^k$. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
25 |
Recall that $f$ is {\it supported} on $S\sub X$ if $f(p, x)$ does not depend on $p$ when |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
26 |
$x \notin S$, and that $f$ is {\it adapted} to $\cU$ if |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
27 |
$f$ is supported on the union of at most $k$ of the $U_\alpha$'s. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
28 |
A chain $c \in CM_*(X, T)$ is adapted to $\cU$ if it is a linear combination of |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
29 |
generators which are adapted. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
30 |
|
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
31 |
\begin{lemma} \label{basic_adaptation_lemma} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
32 |
The $f: P\times X \to T$, as above. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
33 |
The there exists |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
34 |
\[ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
35 |
F: I \times P\times X \to T |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
36 |
\] |
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
37 |
such that |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
38 |
\begin{enumerate} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
39 |
\item $F(0, \cdot, \cdot) = f$ . |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
40 |
\item We can decompose $P = \cup_i D_i$ so that |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
41 |
the restrictions $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D_i\times X\to T$ are all adapted to $\cU$. |
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
42 |
\item If $f$ has support $S\sub X$, then |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
43 |
$F: (I\times P)\times X\to T$ (a $k{+}1$-parameter family of maps) also has support $S$. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
44 |
\item If for all $p\in P$ we have $f(p, \cdot):X\to T$ is a |
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
45 |
[immersion, diffeomorphism, PL homeomorphism, bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism] |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
46 |
then the same is true of $F(t, p, \cdot)$ for all $t\in I$ and $p\in P$. |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
47 |
(Of course we must assume that $X$ and $T$ are the appropriate |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
48 |
sort of manifolds for this to make sense.) |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
49 |
\end{enumerate} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
50 |
\end{lemma} |
245
7537032ad5a0
more evmap.tex; also testing using hg from office computer; also
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
210
diff
changeset
|
51 |
|
194 | 52 |
\begin{proof} |
98 | 53 |
Our homotopy will have the form |
54 |
\eqar{ |
|
55 |
F: I \times P \times X &\to& X \\ |
|
56 |
(t, p, x) &\mapsto& f(u(t, p, x), x) |
|
57 |
} |
|
58 |
for some function |
|
59 |
\eq{ |
|
60 |
u : I \times P \times X \to P . |
|
61 |
} |
|
272 | 62 |
|
63 |
First we describe $u$, then we argue that it makes the conclusions of the lemma true. |
|
98 | 64 |
|
272 | 65 |
For each cover index $\alpha$ choose a cell decomposition $K_\alpha$ of $P$ |
66 |
such that the various $K_\alpha$ are in general position with respect to each other. |
|
67 |
If we are in one of the cases of item 4 of the lemma, also choose $K_\alpha$ |
|
68 |
sufficiently fine as described below. |
|
98 | 69 |
|
272 | 70 |
\def\jj{\tilde{L}} |
71 |
Let $L$ be a common refinement all the $K_\alpha$'s. |
|
72 |
Let $\jj$ denote the handle decomposition of $P$ corresponding to $L$. |
|
73 |
Each $i$-handle $C$ of $\jj$ has an $i$-dimensional tangential coordinate and, |
|
74 |
more importantly for our purposes, a $k{-}i$-dimensional normal coordinate. |
|
75 |
We will typically use the same notation for $i$-cells of $L$ and the |
|
76 |
corresponding $i$-handles of $\jj$. |
|
98 | 77 |
|
273 | 78 |
For each (top-dimensional) $k$-cell $C$ of each $K_\alpha$, choose a point $p(C) \in C \sub P$. |
272 | 79 |
Let $D$ be a $k$-handle of $\jj$. |
273 | 80 |
For each $\alpha$ let $C(D, \alpha)$ be the $k$-cell of $K_\alpha$ which contains $D$ |
81 |
and let $p(D, \alpha) = p(C(D, \alpha))$. |
|
98 | 82 |
|
83 |
For $p \in D$ we define |
|
84 |
\eq{ |
|
273 | 85 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \sum_\alpha r_\alpha(x) p(D, \alpha) . |
98 | 86 |
} |
272 | 87 |
(Recall that $P$ is a convex linear polyhedron, so the weighted average of points of $P$ |
98 | 88 |
makes sense.) |
89 |
||
273 | 90 |
Thus far we have defined $u(t, p, x)$ when $p$ lies in a $k$-handle of $\jj$. |
91 |
We will now extend $u$ inductively to handles of index less than $k$. |
|
92 |
||
93 |
Let $E$ be a $k{-}1$-handle. |
|
94 |
$E$ is homeomorphic to $B^{k-1}\times [0,1]$, and meets |
|
95 |
the $k$-handles at $B^{k-1}\times\{0\}$ and $B^{k-1}\times\{1\}$. |
|
96 |
Let $\eta : E \to [0,1]$, $\eta(x, s) = s$ be the normal coordinate |
|
97 |
of $E$. |
|
98 |
Let $D_0$ and $D_1$ be the two $k$-handles of $\jj$ adjacent to $E$. |
|
99 |
There is at most one index $\beta$ such that $C(D_0, \beta) \ne C(D_1, \beta)$. |
|
274 | 100 |
(If there is no such index, choose $\beta$ |
273 | 101 |
arbitrarily.) |
102 |
For $p \in E$, define |
|
103 |
\eq{ |
|
104 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \left( \sum_{\alpha \ne \beta} r_\alpha(x) p(D_0, \alpha) |
|
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
105 |
+ r_\beta(x) (\eta(p) p(D_0, \beta) + (1-\eta(p)) p(D_1, \beta)) \right) . |
273 | 106 |
} |
98 | 107 |
|
272 | 108 |
|
274 | 109 |
Now for the general case. |
110 |
Let $E$ be a $k{-}j$-handle. |
|
111 |
Let $D_0,\ldots,D_a$ be the $k$-handles adjacent to $E$. |
|
112 |
There is a subset of cover indices $\cN$, of cardinality $j$, |
|
113 |
such that if $\alpha\notin\cN$ then |
|
114 |
$p(D_u, \alpha) = p(D_v, \alpha)$ for all $0\le u,v \le a$. |
|
115 |
For fixed $\beta\in\cN$ let $\{q_{\beta i}\}$ be the set of values of |
|
116 |
$p(D_u, \beta)$ for $0\le u \le a$. |
|
117 |
Recall the product structure $E = B^{k-j}\times B^j$. |
|
118 |
Inductively, we have defined functions $\eta_{\beta i}:\bd B^j \to [0,1]$ such that |
|
119 |
$\sum_i \eta_{\beta i} = 1$ for all $\beta\in \cN$. |
|
120 |
Choose extensions of $\eta_{\beta i}$ to all of $B^j$. |
|
121 |
Via the projection $E\to B^j$, regard $\eta_{\beta i}$ as a function on $E$. |
|
98 | 122 |
Now define, for $p \in E$, |
194 | 123 |
\begin{equation} |
124 |
\label{eq:u} |
|
98 | 125 |
u(t, p, x) = (1-t)p + t \left( |
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
126 |
\sum_{\alpha \notin \cN} r_\alpha(x) p(D_0, \alpha) |
98 | 127 |
+ \sum_{\beta \in \cN} r_\beta(x) \left( \sum_i \eta_{\beta i}(p) \cdot q_{\beta i} \right) |
128 |
\right) . |
|
194 | 129 |
\end{equation} |
98 | 130 |
|
131 |
This completes the definition of $u: I \times P \times X \to P$. |
|
132 |
||
133 |
\medskip |
|
134 |
||
274 | 135 |
Next we verify that $u$ affords $F$ the properties claimed in the statement of the lemma. |
98 | 136 |
|
137 |
Since $u(0, p, x) = p$ for all $p\in P$ and $x\in X$, $F(0, p, x) = f(p, x)$ for all $p$ and $x$. |
|
138 |
Therefore $F$ is a homotopy from $f$ to something. |
|
139 |
||
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
140 |
|
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
141 |
\medskip |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
142 |
|
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
143 |
Next we show that for each handle $D$ of $J$, $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D\times X \to X$ |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
144 |
is a singular cell adapted to $\cU$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
145 |
Let $k-j$ be the index of $D$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
146 |
Referring to Equation \ref{eq:u}, we see that $F(1, p, x)$ depends on $p$ only if |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
147 |
$r_\beta(x) \ne 0$ for some $\beta\in\cN$, i.e.\ only if |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
148 |
$x\in \bigcup_{\beta\in\cN} U_\beta$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
149 |
Since the cardinality of $\cN$ is $j$ which is less than or equal to $k$, |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
150 |
this shows that $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D\times X \to X$ is adapted to $\cU$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
151 |
|
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
152 |
\medskip |
274 | 153 |
|
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
154 |
Next we show that $F$ does not increase supports. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
155 |
If $f(p,x) = f(p',x)$ for all $p,p'\in P$, |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
156 |
then |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
157 |
\[ |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
158 |
F(t, p, x) = f(u(t,p,x),x) = f(u(t',p',x),x) = F(t',p',x) |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
159 |
\] |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
160 |
for all $(t,p)$ and $(t',p')$ in $I\times P$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
161 |
|
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
162 |
\medskip |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
163 |
|
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
164 |
Now for claim 4 of the lemma. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
165 |
Assume that $X$ and $T$ are smooth manifolds and that $f$ is a family of diffeomorphisms. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
166 |
We must show that we can choose the $K_\alpha$'s and $u$ so that $F(t, p, \cdot)$ is a |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
167 |
diffeomorphism for all $t$ and $p$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
168 |
It suffices to |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
169 |
show that the derivative $\pd{F}{x}(t, p, x)$ is non-singular for all $(t, p, x)$. |
98 | 170 |
We have |
171 |
\eq{ |
|
172 |
% \pd{F}{x}(t, p, x) = \pd{f}{x}(u(t, p, x), x) + \pd{f}{p}(u(t, p, x), x) \pd{u}{x}(t, p, x) . |
|
173 |
\pd{F}{x} = \pd{f}{x} + \pd{f}{p} \pd{u}{x} . |
|
174 |
} |
|
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
175 |
Since $f$ is a family of diffeomorphisms and $X$ and $P$ are compact, |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
176 |
$\pd{f}{x}$ is non-singular and bounded away from zero. |
98 | 177 |
Also, $\pd{f}{p}$ is bounded. |
178 |
So if we can insure that $\pd{u}{x}$ is sufficiently small, we are done. |
|
194 | 179 |
It follows from Equation \eqref{eq:u} above that $\pd{u}{x}$ depends on $\pd{r_\alpha}{x}$ |
98 | 180 |
(which is bounded) |
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
181 |
and the differences amongst the various $p(D_0,\alpha)$'s and $q_{\beta i}$'s. |
98 | 182 |
These differences are small if the cell decompositions $K_\alpha$ are sufficiently fine. |
183 |
This completes the proof that $F$ is a homotopy through diffeomorphisms. |
|
184 |
||
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
185 |
If we replace ``diffeomorphism" with ``immersion" in the above paragraph, the argument goes |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
186 |
through essentially unchanged. |
98 | 187 |
|
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
188 |
Next we consider the case where $f$ is a family of bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
189 |
We assume that $f$ is Lipschitz in $P$ direction as well. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
190 |
The argument in this case is similar to the one above for diffeomorphisms, with |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
191 |
bounded partial derivatives replaced by Lipschitz constants. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
192 |
Since $X$ and $P$ are compact, there is a universal bi-Lipschitz constant that works for |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
193 |
$f(p, \cdot)$ for all $p$. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
194 |
By choosing the cell decompositions $K_\alpha$ sufficiently fine, |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
195 |
we can insure that $u$ has a small Lipschitz constant in the $X$ direction. |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
196 |
This allows us to show that $F(t, p, \cdot)$ has a bi-Lipschitz constant |
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
197 |
close to the universal bi-Lipschitz constant for $f$. |
98 | 198 |
|
275
81d7c550b3da
finshed proof of main lemma in famodiff appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
274
diff
changeset
|
199 |
Since PL homeomorphisms are bi-Lipschitz, we have established this last remaining case of claim 4 of the lemma as well. |
194 | 200 |
\end{proof} |
98 | 201 |
|
276 | 202 |
\begin{lemma} |
203 |
Let $CM_*(X\to T)$ be the singular chains on the space of continuous maps |
|
204 |
[resp. immersions, diffeomorphisms, PL homeomorphisms, bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms] |
|
205 |
from $X$ to $T$, and let $G_*\sub CM_*(X\to T)$ denote the chains adapted to an open cover $\cU$ |
|
206 |
of $X$. |
|
207 |
Then $G_*$ is a strong deformation retract of $CM_*(X\to T)$. |
|
208 |
\end{lemma} |
|
209 |
\begin{proof} |
|
210 |
\nn{my current idea is too messy, so I'm going to wait and hopefully think |
|
211 |
of a cleaner proof} |
|
272 | 212 |
\noop{ |
276 | 213 |
If suffices to show that |
214 |
... |
|
215 |
Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} |
|
216 |
... |
|
217 |
} |
|
218 |
\end{proof} |
|
272 | 219 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
220 |
\medskip |
272 | 221 |
|
276 | 222 |
\nn{need to clean up references from the main text to the lemmas of this section} |
272 | 223 |
|
277 | 224 |
\noop{ |
225 |
||
272 | 226 |
\medskip |
276 | 227 |
|
228 |
\nn{do we want to keep the following?} |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
229 |
|
277 | 230 |
\nn{ack! not easy to adapt (pun) this old text to continuous maps (instead of homeos, as |
231 |
in the old version); just delete (\\noop) it all for now} |
|
232 |
||
276 | 233 |
The above lemmas remain true if we replace ``adapted" with ``strongly adapted", as defined below. |
234 |
The proof of Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} is modified by |
|
235 |
choosing the common refinement $L$ and interpolating maps $\eta$ |
|
236 |
slightly more carefully. |
|
237 |
Since we don't need the stronger result, we omit the details. |
|
238 |
||
239 |
Let $X$, $T$ and $\cU$ be as above. |
|
240 |
A $k$-parameter family of maps $f: P \times X \to T$ is |
|
241 |
{\it strongly adapted to $\cU$} if there is a factorization |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
242 |
\eq{ |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
243 |
P = P_1 \times \cdots \times P_m |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
244 |
} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
245 |
(for some $m \le k$) |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
246 |
and families of homeomorphisms |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
247 |
\eq{ |
276 | 248 |
f_i : P_i \times X \to T |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
249 |
} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
250 |
such that |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
251 |
\begin{itemize} |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
252 |
\item each $f_i$ is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
253 |
\item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint; |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
254 |
\item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s, |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
255 |
where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
256 |
\item $f(p, \cdot) = g \circ f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot)$ |
277 | 257 |
for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g:X\to T$. |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
258 |
\end{itemize} |
276 | 259 |
|
277 | 260 |
} |
261 |
% end \noop |
|
276 | 262 |
|
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
263 |
\medskip |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
264 |
\hrule |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
265 |
\medskip |
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
266 |
|
276 | 267 |
\nn{do we want to keep this alternative construction?} |
271
cb40431c8a65
begin to revise families of maps appendix
Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net>
parents:
245
diff
changeset
|
268 |
|
194 | 269 |
\input{text/appendixes/explicit.tex} |
270 |