text/ncat.tex
changeset 205 0127f415fb65
parent 204 470fe2c71305
child 206 aa7c033bacfa
equal deleted inserted replaced
204:470fe2c71305 205:0127f415fb65
    87 For $k>1$ and in the presence of strong duality the domain/range division makes less sense.
    87 For $k>1$ and in the presence of strong duality the domain/range division makes less sense.
    88 \nn{maybe say more here; rotate disk, Frobenius reciprocity blah blah}
    88 \nn{maybe say more here; rotate disk, Frobenius reciprocity blah blah}
    89 We prefer to combine the domain and range into a single entity which we call the 
    89 We prefer to combine the domain and range into a single entity which we call the 
    90 boundary of a morphism.
    90 boundary of a morphism.
    91 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres:
    91 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres:
       
    92 
       
    93 \nn{perhaps it's better to define $\cC(S^k)$ as a colimit, rather than making it new data}
    92 
    94 
    93 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries (spheres)]
    95 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries (spheres)]
    94 For each $0 \le k \le n-1$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
    96 For each $0 \le k \le n-1$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
    95 the category of $k$-spheres and 
    97 the category of $k$-spheres and 
    96 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
    98 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
  1078 
  1080 
  1079 
  1081 
  1080 
  1082 
  1081 \subsection{The $n{+}1$-category of sphere modules}
  1083 \subsection{The $n{+}1$-category of sphere modules}
  1082 
  1084 
  1083 In this subsection we define an $n{+}1$-category of ``sphere modules" whose objects
  1085 In this subsection we define an $n{+}1$-category $\cS$ of ``sphere modules" 
  1084 correspond to $n$-categories.
  1086 whose objects correspond to $n$-categories.
  1085 This is a version of the familiar algebras-bimodules-intertwinors 2-category.
  1087 This is a version of the familiar algebras-bimodules-intertwiners 2-category.
  1086 (Terminology: It is clearly appropriate to call an $S^0$ modules a bimodule,
  1088 (Terminology: It is clearly appropriate to call an $S^0$ modules a bimodule,
  1087 since a 0-sphere has an obvious bi-ness.
  1089 since a 0-sphere has an obvious bi-ness.
  1088 This is much less true for higher dimensional spheres, 
  1090 This is much less true for higher dimensional spheres, 
  1089 so we prefer the term ``sphere module" for the general case.)
  1091 so we prefer the term ``sphere module" for the general case.)
  1090 
  1092 
  1091 
  1093 The $0$- through $n$-dimensional parts of $\cC$ are various sorts of modules, and we describe
  1092 
  1094 these first.
  1093 \nn{need to assume a little extra structure to define the top ($n+1$) part (?)}
  1095 The $n{+}1$-dimensional part of $\cS$ consist of intertwiners
       
  1096 (of garden-variety $1$-category modules associated to decorated $n$-balls).
       
  1097 We will see below that in order for these $n{+}1$-morphisms to satisfy all of
       
  1098 the duality requirements of an $n{+}1$-category, we will have to assume
       
  1099 that our $n$-categories and modules have non-degenerate inner products.
       
  1100 (In other words, we need to assume some extra duality on the $n$-categories and modules.)
       
  1101 
       
  1102 \medskip
       
  1103 
       
  1104 Our first task is to define an $n$-category $m$-sphere module, for $0\le m \le n-1$.
       
  1105 These will be defined in terms of certain classes of marked balls, very similarly
       
  1106 to the definition of $n$-category modules above.
       
  1107 (This, in turn, is very similar to our definition of $n$-category.)
       
  1108 Because of this similarity, we only sketch the definitions below.
       
  1109 
       
  1110 We start with 0-sphere modules, which also could reasonably be called (categorified) bimodules.
       
  1111 (For $n=1$ they are precisely bimodules in the usual, uncategorified sense.)
       
  1112 Define a 0-marked $k$-ball $(X, M)$, $1\le k \le n$, to be a pair homeomorphic to the standard
       
  1113 $(B^k, B^{k-1})$, where $B^{k-1}$ is properly embedded in $B^k$.
       
  1114 See Figure xxxx.
       
  1115 Another way to say this is that $(X, M)$ is homeomorphic to $B^{k-1}\times([-1,1], \{0\})$.
       
  1116 
       
  1117 0-marked balls can be cut into smaller balls in various ways.
       
  1118 These smaller balls could be 0-marked or plain.
       
  1119 We can also take the boundary of a 0-marked ball, which is 0-marked sphere.
       
  1120 
       
  1121 Fix $n$-categories $\cA$ and $\cB$.
       
  1122 These will label the two halves of a 0-marked $k$-ball.
       
  1123 The 0-sphere module we define next will depend on $\cA$ and $\cB$ 
       
  1124 (it's an $\cA$-$\cB$ bimodule), but we will suppress that from the notation.
       
  1125 
       
  1126 An $n$-category 0-sphere module $\cM$ is a collection of functors $\cM_k$ from the category
       
  1127 of 0-marked $k$-balls, $1\le k \le n$,
       
  1128 (with the two halves labeled by $\cA$ and $\cB$) to the category of sets.
       
  1129 If $k=n$ these sets should be enriched to the extent $\cA$ and $\cB$ are.
       
  1130 Given a decomposition of a 0-marked $k$-ball $X$ into smaller balls $X_i$, we have
       
  1131 morphism sets $\cA_k(X_i)$ (if $X_i$ lies on the $\cA$-labeled side)
       
  1132 or $\cB_k(X_i)$ (if $X_i$ lies on the $\cB$-labeled side)
       
  1133 or $\cM_k(X_i)$ (if $X_i$ intersects the marking and is therefore a smaller 0-marked ball).
       
  1134 Corresponding to this decomposition we have an action and/or composition map
       
  1135 from the product of these various sets into $\cM(X)$.
       
  1136 
       
  1137 \medskip
       
  1138 
       
  1139 
       
  1140 
  1094 
  1141 
  1095 \medskip
  1142 \medskip
  1096 \hrule
  1143 \hrule
  1097 \medskip
  1144 \medskip
  1098 
  1145