text/ncat.tex
changeset 874 4fd165bc745b
parent 870 92bf1b37af9b
child 875 85cebbd771b5
equal deleted inserted replaced
873:c9e955e08768 874:4fd165bc745b
   212 If $S$ is a 0-sphere (the case $k=1$ above), then $S$ can be identified with the {\it disjoint} union
   212 If $S$ is a 0-sphere (the case $k=1$ above), then $S$ can be identified with the {\it disjoint} union
   213 of two 0-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$ and the colimit construction $\cl{\cC}(S)$ can be identified
   213 of two 0-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$ and the colimit construction $\cl{\cC}(S)$ can be identified
   214 with the (ordinary, not fibered) product $\cC(B_1) \times \cC(B_2)$.
   214 with the (ordinary, not fibered) product $\cC(B_1) \times \cC(B_2)$.
   215 
   215 
   216 Let $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$ denote the image of $\gl_E$.
   216 Let $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$ denote the image of $\gl_E$.
   217 We will refer to elements of $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$ as ``splittable along $E$" or ``transverse to $E$".  When the gluing map is surjective every such element is splittable.
   217 We will refer to elements of $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$ as ``splittable along $E$" or ``transverse to $E$". 
       
   218 When the gluing map is surjective every such element is splittable.
   218 
   219 
   219 If $X$ is a $k$-ball and $E \sub \bd X$ splits $\bd X$ into two $k{-}1$-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$
   220 If $X$ is a $k$-ball and $E \sub \bd X$ splits $\bd X$ into two $k{-}1$-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$
   220 as above, then we define $\cC(X)\trans E = \bd^{-1}(\cl{\cC}(\bd X)\trans E)$.
   221 as above, then we define $\cC(X)\trans E = \bd^{-1}(\cl{\cC}(\bd X)\trans E)$.
   221 
   222 
   222 We will call the projection $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E \to \cC(B_i)$
   223 We will call the projection $\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E \to \cC(B_i)$ given by the composition
       
   224 $$\cl{\cC}(S)\trans E \xrightarrow{\gl^{-1}} \cC(B_1) \times \cC(B_2) \xrightarrow{\pr_i} \cC(B_i)$$
   223 a {\it restriction} map and write $\res_{B_i}(a)$
   225 a {\it restriction} map and write $\res_{B_i}(a)$
   224 (or simply $\res(a)$ when there is no ambiguity), for $a\in \cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$.
   226 (or simply $\res(a)$ when there is no ambiguity), for $a\in \cl{\cC}(S)\trans E$.
   225 More generally, we also include under the rubric ``restriction map"
   227 More generally, we also include under the rubric ``restriction map"
   226 the boundary maps of Axiom \ref{nca-boundary} above,
   228 the boundary maps of Axiom \ref{nca-boundary} above,
   227 another class of maps introduced after Axiom \ref{nca-assoc} below, as well as any composition
   229 another class of maps introduced after Axiom \ref{nca-assoc} below, as well as any composition
   228 of restriction maps.
   230 of restriction maps.
   229 In particular, we have restriction maps $\cC(X)\trans E \to \cC(B_i)$
   231 In particular, we have restriction maps $\cC(X)\trans E \to \cC(B_i)$
   230 ($i = 1, 2$, notation from previous paragraph).
   232 defined as the composition of the boundary with the first restriction map described above:
       
   233 $$
       
   234 \cC(X) \trans E \xrightarrow{\bdy} \cl{\cC}(\bdy X)\trans E \xrightarrow{\res} \cC(B_i)
       
   235 .$$
   231 These restriction maps can be thought of as 
   236 These restriction maps can be thought of as 
   232 domain and range maps, relative to the choice of splitting $\bd X = B_1 \cup_E B_2$.
   237 domain and range maps, relative to the choice of splitting $\bd X = B_1 \cup_E B_2$.
       
   238 These restriction maps in fact have their image in the subset $\cC(B_i)\trans E$,
       
   239 and so to emphasize this we will sometimes write the restriction map as $\cC(X)\trans E \to \cC(B_i)\trans E$.
   233 
   240 
   234 
   241 
   235 Next we consider composition of morphisms.
   242 Next we consider composition of morphisms.
   236 For $n$-categories which lack strong duality, one usually considers
   243 For $n$-categories which lack strong duality, one usually considers
   237 $k$ different types of composition of $k$-morphisms, each associated to a different ``direction".
   244 $k$ different types of composition of $k$-morphisms, each associated to a different ``direction".