text/ncat.tex
changeset 559 62a402dd3e6e
parent 557 5fdf1488ce20
child 560 b138ee4a5938
equal deleted inserted replaced
558:c393d1202724 559:62a402dd3e6e
  2077 \label{jun23c}
  2077 \label{jun23c}
  2078 \end{figure}
  2078 \end{figure}
  2079 Let $D' = B\cap C$.
  2079 Let $D' = B\cap C$.
  2080 It is not hard too show that the above two maps are mutually inverse.
  2080 It is not hard too show that the above two maps are mutually inverse.
  2081 
  2081 
  2082 \begin{lem}
  2082 \begin{lem} \label{equator-lemma}
  2083 Any two choices of $E$ and $E'$ are related by a series of modifications as above.
  2083 Any two choices of $E$ and $E'$ are related by a series of modifications as above.
  2084 \end{lem}
  2084 \end{lem}
  2085 
  2085 
  2086 \begin{proof}
  2086 \begin{proof}
  2087 (Sketch)
  2087 (Sketch)
  2235 
  2235 
  2236 We define product $n{+}1$-morphisms to be identity maps of modules.
  2236 We define product $n{+}1$-morphisms to be identity maps of modules.
  2237 
  2237 
  2238 To define (binary) composition of $n{+}1$-morphisms, choose the obvious common equator
  2238 To define (binary) composition of $n{+}1$-morphisms, choose the obvious common equator
  2239 then compose the module maps.
  2239 then compose the module maps.
  2240 Associativity of this composition rules follows from repeated application of the adjoint identity between
  2240 The proof that this composition rule is associative is similar to the proof of Lemma \ref{equator-lemma}.
  2241 the maps of Figures \ref{jun23b} and \ref{jun23c}.
       
  2242 
       
  2243 
       
  2244 %\nn{still to do: associativity}
       
  2245 
       
  2246 \medskip
       
  2247 
       
  2248 %\nn{Stuff that remains to be done (either below or in an appendix or in a separate section or in
       
  2249 %a separate paper): discuss Morita equivalence; functors}
       
  2250 
       
  2251