text/tqftreview.tex
changeset 411 98b8559b0b7a
parent 409 291f82fb79b5
child 412 87b1507ebc56
equal deleted inserted replaced
410:14e3124a48e8 411:98b8559b0b7a
     2 
     2 
     3 \section{TQFTs via fields}
     3 \section{TQFTs via fields}
     4 \label{sec:fields}
     4 \label{sec:fields}
     5 \label{sec:tqftsviafields}
     5 \label{sec:tqftsviafields}
     6 
     6 
     7 In this section we review the notion of a ``system of fields and local relations".
     7 In this section we review the construction of TQFTs from fields and local relations.
     8 For more details see \cite{kw:tqft}.
     8 For more details see \cite{kw:tqft}.
     9 From a system of fields and local relations we can readily construct TQFT invariants of manifolds.
     9 For our purposes, a TQFT is {\it defined} to be something which arises
    10 This is described in \S \ref{sec:constructing-a-tqft}.
    10 from this construction.
       
    11 This is an alternative to the more common definition of a TQFT
       
    12 as a functor on cobordism categories satisfying various conditions.
       
    13 A fully local (``down to points") version of the cobordism-functor TQFT definition
       
    14 should be equivalent to the fields-and-local-relations definition.
       
    15 
    11 A system of fields is very closely related to an $n$-category.
    16 A system of fields is very closely related to an $n$-category.
    12 In Example \ref{ex:traditional-n-categories(fields)}, which runs throughout this section, 
    17 In one direction, Example \ref{ex:traditional-n-categories(fields)}
    13 we sketch the construction of a system of fields from an $n$-category.
    18 shows how to construct a system of fields from a (traditional) $n$-category.
    14 We make this more precise for $n=1$ or $2$ in \S \ref{sec:example:traditional-n-categories(fields)}, 
    19 We do this in detail for $n=1,2$ (Subsection \ref{sec:example:traditional-n-categories(fields)}) 
    15 and much later, after we've have given our own definition of a `topological $n$-category' in \S \ref{sec:ncats}, 
    20 and more informally for general $n$.
    16 we explain precisely how to go back and forth between a topological $n$-category and a system of fields and local relations.
    21 In the other direction, 
       
    22 our preferred definition of an $n$-category in Section \ref{sec:ncats} is essentially
       
    23 just a system of fields restricted to balls of dimensions 0 through $n$;
       
    24 one could call this the ``local" part of a system of fields.
       
    25 
       
    26 Since this section is intended primarily to motivate
       
    27 the blob complex construction of Section \ref{sec:blob-definition}, 
       
    28 we suppress some technical details.
       
    29 In Section \ref{sec:ncats} the analogous details are treated more carefully.
       
    30 
       
    31 \medskip
    17 
    32 
    18 We only consider compact manifolds, so if $Y \sub X$ is a closed codimension 0
    33 We only consider compact manifolds, so if $Y \sub X$ is a closed codimension 0
    19 submanifold of $X$, then $X \setmin Y$ implicitly means the closure
    34 submanifold of $X$, then $X \setmin Y$ implicitly means the closure
    20 $\overline{X \setmin Y}$.
    35 $\overline{X \setmin Y}$.
    21 
    36 
    24 
    39 
    25 Let $\cM_k$ denote the category with objects 
    40 Let $\cM_k$ denote the category with objects 
    26 unoriented PL manifolds of dimension
    41 unoriented PL manifolds of dimension
    27 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
    42 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
    28 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
    43 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
    29 oriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
    44 oriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for simplicity we
    30 will stick with unoriented PL.)
    45 will stick with unoriented PL.)
    31 
    46 
    32 Fix a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$.
    47 Fix a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$.
    33 While reading the definition, you should just think about the cases $\cS = \Set$ or $\cS = \Vect$.
    48 Fields on $n$-manifolds will be enriched over $\cS$.
       
    49 Good examples to keep in mind are $\cS = \Set$ or $\cS = \Vect$.
    34 The presentation here requires that the objects of $\cS$ have an underlying set, but this could probably be avoided if desired.
    50 The presentation here requires that the objects of $\cS$ have an underlying set, but this could probably be avoided if desired.
    35 
    51 
    36 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$
    52 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$
    37 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$
    53 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$
    38 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
    54 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
    62 and these maps comprise a natural
    78 and these maps comprise a natural
    63 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
    79 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
    64 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
    80 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
    65 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
    81 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
    66 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
    82 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
    67 \item The subset $\cC_n(X;c)$ of top fields with a given boundary condition is an object in our symmetric monoidal category $\cS$.
    83 \item The subset $\cC_n(X;c)$ of top-dimensional fields 
    68 (This condition is of course trivial when $\cS = \Set$.) If the objects are sets with extra structure (e.g. $\cS = \Vect$ or $\Kom$), 
    84 with a given boundary condition is an object in our symmetric monoidal category $\cS$.
       
    85 (This condition is of course trivial when $\cS = \Set$.) 
       
    86 If the objects are sets with extra structure (e.g. $\cS = \Vect$ or $\Kom$), 
    69 then this extra structure is considered part of the definition of $\cC_n$.
    87 then this extra structure is considered part of the definition of $\cC_n$.
    70 Any maps mentioned below between top level fields must be morphisms in $\cS$.
    88 Any maps mentioned below between fields on $n$-manifolds must be morphisms in $\cS$.
    71 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
    89 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
    72 structures on $\cM_k$, $\Set$ and $\cS$: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
    90 structures on $\cM_k$, $\Set$ and $\cS$: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
    73 compatibly with homeomorphisms and restriction to boundary.
    91 compatibly with homeomorphisms and restriction to boundary.
    74 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
    92 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
    75 restriction maps.
    93 restriction maps.
    84 \[
   102 \[
    85 	\Eq_Y(\cC_k(X)) \hookrightarrow \cC_k(X\sgl) ,
   103 	\Eq_Y(\cC_k(X)) \hookrightarrow \cC_k(X\sgl) ,
    86 \]
   104 \]
    87 and this gluing map is compatible with all of the above structure (actions
   105 and this gluing map is compatible with all of the above structure (actions
    88 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, disjoint union).
   106 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, disjoint union).
    89 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
   107 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity 
       
   108 and collaring maps,
    90 the gluing map is surjective.
   109 the gluing map is surjective.
    91 We say that fields on $X\sgl$ in the image of the gluing map
   110 We say that fields on $X\sgl$ in the image of the gluing map
    92 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
   111 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
    93 \item Gluing with corners.
   112 \item Gluing with corners.
    94 Let $\bd X = Y \cup Y \cup W$, where the two copies of $Y$ and 
   113 Let $\bd X = Y \cup Y \cup W$, where the two copies of $Y$ and 
    95 $W$ might intersect along their boundaries.
   114 $W$ might intersect along their boundaries.
    96 Let $X\sgl$ denote $X$ glued to itself along the two copies of $Y$.
   115 Let $X\sgl$ denote $X$ glued to itself along the two copies of $Y$
       
   116 (Figure xxxx).
    97 Note that $\bd X\sgl = W\sgl$, where $W\sgl$ denotes $W$ glued to itself
   117 Note that $\bd X\sgl = W\sgl$, where $W\sgl$ denotes $W$ glued to itself
    98 (without corners) along two copies of $\bd Y$.
   118 (without corners) along two copies of $\bd Y$.
    99 Let $c\sgl \in \cC_{k-1}(W\sgl)$ be a be a splittable field on $W\sgl$ and let
   119 Let $c\sgl \in \cC_{k-1}(W\sgl)$ be a be a splittable field on $W\sgl$ and let
   100 $c \in \cC_{k-1}(W)$ be the cut open version of $c\sgl$.
   120 $c \in \cC_{k-1}(W)$ be the cut open version of $c\sgl$.
   101 Let $\cC^c_k(X)$ denote the subset of $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$ on $W$.
   121 Let $\cC^c_k(X)$ denote the subset of $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$ on $W$.
   102 (This restriction map uses the gluing without corners map above.)
   122 (This restriction map uses the gluing without corners map above.)
   103 Using the boundary restriction, gluing without corners, and (in one case) orientation reversal
   123 Using the boundary restriction and gluing without corners maps, 
   104 maps, we get two maps $\cC^c_k(X) \to \cC(Y)$, corresponding to the two
   124 we get two maps $\cC^c_k(X) \to \cC(Y)$, corresponding to the two
   105 copies of $Y$ in $\bd X$.
   125 copies of $Y$ in $\bd X$.
   106 Let $\Eq^c_Y(\cC_k(X))$ denote the equalizer of these two maps.
   126 Let $\Eq^c_Y(\cC_k(X))$ denote the equalizer of these two maps.
   107 Then (here's the axiom/definition part) there is an injective ``gluing" map
   127 Then (here's the axiom/definition part) there is an injective ``gluing" map
   108 \[
   128 \[
   109 	\Eq^c_Y(\cC_k(X)) \hookrightarrow \cC_k(X\sgl, c\sgl) ,
   129 	\Eq^c_Y(\cC_k(X)) \hookrightarrow \cC_k(X\sgl, c\sgl) ,
   110 \]
   130 \]
   111 and this gluing map is compatible with all of the above structure (actions
   131 and this gluing map is compatible with all of the above structure (actions
   112 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
   132 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, disjoint union).
   113 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
   133 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity
       
   134 and collaring maps,
   114 the gluing map is surjective.
   135 the gluing map is surjective.
   115 We say that fields in the image of the gluing map
   136 We say that fields in the image of the gluing map
   116 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
   137 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
   117 \item There are maps $\cC_{k-1}(Y) \to \cC_k(Y \times I)$, denoted
   138 \item Product fields.
       
   139 There are maps $\cC_{k-1}(Y) \to \cC_k(Y \times I)$, denoted
   118 $c \mapsto c\times I$.
   140 $c \mapsto c\times I$.
   119 These maps comprise a natural transformation of functors, and commute appropriately
   141 These maps comprise a natural transformation of functors, and commute appropriately
   120 with all the structure maps above (disjoint union, boundary restriction, etc.).
   142 with all the structure maps above (disjoint union, boundary restriction, etc.).
   121 Furthermore, if $f: Y\times I \to Y\times I$ is a fiber-preserving homeomorphism
   143 Furthermore, if $f: Y\times I \to Y\times I$ is a fiber-preserving homeomorphism
   122 covering $\bar{f}:Y\to Y$, then $f(c\times I) = \bar{f}(c)\times I$.
   144 covering $\bar{f}:Y\to Y$, then $f(c\times I) = \bar{f}(c)\times I$.
   134 \]
   156 \]
   135 in the case that $X = X_1 \du X_2$, with $x_i \in \cC(X_i)$.
   157 in the case that $X = X_1 \du X_2$, with $x_i \in \cC(X_i)$.
   136 
   158 
   137 \medskip
   159 \medskip
   138 
   160 
   139 Using the functoriality and $\cdot\times I$ properties above, together
   161 Using the functoriality and product field properties above, together
   140 with boundary collar homeomorphisms of manifolds, we can define the notion of 
   162 with boundary collar homeomorphisms of manifolds, we can define 
   141 {\it extended isotopy}.
   163 {\it collar maps} $\cC(M)\to \cC(M)$.
   142 Let $M$ be an $n$-manifold and $Y \subset \bd M$ be a codimension zero submanifold
   164 Let $M$ be an $n$-manifold and $Y \subset \bd M$ be a codimension zero submanifold
   143 of $\bd M$.
   165 of $\bd M$.
   144 Let $x \in \cC(M)$ be a field on $M$ and such that $\bd x$ is splittable along $\bd Y$.
   166 Let $x \in \cC(M)$ be a field on $M$ and such that $\bd x$ is splittable along $\bd Y$.
   145 Let $c$ be $x$ restricted to $Y$.
   167 Let $c$ be $x$ restricted to $Y$.
   146 Let $M \cup (Y\times I)$ denote $M$ glued to $Y\times I$ along $Y$.
   168 Let $M \cup (Y\times I)$ denote $M$ glued to $Y\times I$ along $Y$.
   147 Then we have the glued field $x \bullet (c\times I)$ on $M \cup (Y\times I)$.
   169 Then we have the glued field $x \bullet (c\times I)$ on $M \cup (Y\times I)$.
   148 Let $f: M \cup (Y\times I) \to M$ be a collaring homeomorphism.
   170 Let $f: M \cup (Y\times I) \to M$ be a collaring homeomorphism.
   149 Then we say that $x$ is {\it extended isotopic} to $f(x \bullet (c\times I))$.
   171 Then we call the map $x \mapsto f(x \bullet (c\times I))$ a {\it collar map}.
   150 More generally, we define extended isotopy to be the equivalence relation on fields
   172 We call the equivalence relation generated by collar maps and
   151 on $M$ generated by isotopy plus all instance of the above construction
   173 homeomorphisms isotopic to the identity {\it extended isotopy}, since the collar maps
   152 (for all appropriate $Y$ and $x$).
   174 can be thought of (informally) as the limit of homeomorphisms
       
   175 which expand an infinitesimally thin collar neighborhood of $Y$ to a thicker
       
   176 collar neighborhood.
       
   177 
       
   178 
       
   179 % all this linearizing stuff is unnecessary, I think
       
   180 \noop{
   153 
   181 
   154 \nn{the following discussion of linearizing fields is kind of lame.
   182 \nn{the following discussion of linearizing fields is kind of lame.
   155 maybe just assume things are already linearized.}
   183 maybe just assume things are already linearized.}
   156 
   184 
   157 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   185 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   192 space determined by the labeling of the link of the 0-cell.
   220 space determined by the labeling of the link of the 0-cell.
   193 (If the 0-cell were labeled, the label would live in this space.)
   221 (If the 0-cell were labeled, the label would live in this space.)
   194 We associate to each almost-labeling the tensor product of these spaces (one for each 0-cell).
   222 We associate to each almost-labeling the tensor product of these spaces (one for each 0-cell).
   195 We now define $\lf(X; a)$ to be the direct sum over all almost labelings of the
   223 We now define $\lf(X; a)$ to be the direct sum over all almost labelings of the
   196 above tensor products.
   224 above tensor products.
       
   225 
       
   226 } % end \noop
   197 
   227 
   198 
   228 
   199 \subsection{Systems of fields from $n$-categories}
   229 \subsection{Systems of fields from $n$-categories}
   200 \label{sec:example:traditional-n-categories(fields)}
   230 \label{sec:example:traditional-n-categories(fields)}
   201 We now describe in more detail Example \ref{ex:traditional-n-categories(fields)}, 
   231 We now describe in more detail Example \ref{ex:traditional-n-categories(fields)},