text/a_inf_blob.tex
changeset 212 c2d2a8f8d70c
parent 211 ef127ac682bd
child 213 a60332c29d0b
equal deleted inserted replaced
211:ef127ac682bd 212:c2d2a8f8d70c
   262 
   262 
   263 \begin{thm} \label{thm:map-recon}
   263 \begin{thm} \label{thm:map-recon}
   264 $\cB^\cT(M) \simeq C_*(\Maps(M\to T))$.
   264 $\cB^\cT(M) \simeq C_*(\Maps(M\to T))$.
   265 \end{thm}
   265 \end{thm}
   266 \begin{proof}
   266 \begin{proof}
   267 \nn{obvious map in one direction; use \ref{extension_lemma_b}; ...}
   267 We begin by constructing chain map $g: \cB^\cT(M) \to C_*(\Maps(M\to T))$.
   268 \end{proof}
   268 We then use \ref{extension_lemma_b} to show that $g$ induces isomorphisms on homology.
   269 
   269 
   270 \nn{should also mention version where we enrich over
   270 Recall that the homotopy colimit $\cB^\cT(M)$ is constructed out of a series of
   271 spaces rather than chain complexes; should comment on Lurie's (and others')  similar result
   271 $j$-fold mapping cylinders, $j \ge 0$.
       
   272 So, as an abelian group (but not as a chain complex), 
       
   273 \[
       
   274 	\cB^\cT(M) = \bigoplus_{j\ge 0} C^j,
       
   275 \]
       
   276 where $C^j$ denotes the new chains introduced by the $j$-fold mapping cylinders.
       
   277 
       
   278 Recall that $C^0$ is a direct sum of chain complexes with the summands indexed by
       
   279 decompositions of $M$ which have their $n{-}1$-skeletons labeled by $n{-}1$-morphisms
       
   280 of $\cT$.
       
   281 Since $\cT = \pi^\infty_{\leq n}(T)$, this means that the summands are indexed by pairs
       
   282 $(K, \vphi)$, where $K$ is a decomposition of $M$ and $\vphi$ is a continuous
       
   283 maps from the $n{-}1$-skeleton of $K$ to $T$.
       
   284 The summand indexed by $(K, \vphi)$ is
       
   285 \[
       
   286 	\bigotimes_b D_*(b, \vphi),
       
   287 \]
       
   288 where $b$ runs through the $n$-cells of $K$ and $D_*(b, \vphi)$ denotes
       
   289 chains of maps from $b$ to $T$ compatible with $\vphi$.
       
   290 We can take the product of these chains of maps to get a chains of maps from
       
   291 all of $M$ to $K$.
       
   292 This defines $g$ on $C^0$.
       
   293 
       
   294 We define $g(C^j) = 0$ for $j > 0$.
       
   295 It is not hard to see that this defines a chain map from 
       
   296 $\cB^\cT(M)$ to $C_*(\Maps(M\to T))$.
       
   297 
       
   298 \nn{...}
       
   299 
       
   300 
       
   301 
       
   302 \end{proof}
       
   303 
       
   304 \nn{maybe should also mention version where we enrich over
       
   305 spaces rather than chain complexes; should comment on Lurie's (and others') similar result
   272 for the $E_\infty$ case, and mention that our version does not require 
   306 for the $E_\infty$ case, and mention that our version does not require 
   273 any connectivity assumptions}
   307 any connectivity assumptions}
   274 
   308 
   275 \medskip
   309 \medskip
   276 \hrule
   310 \hrule