text/hochschild.tex
changeset 417 d3b05641e7ca
parent 409 291f82fb79b5
child 437 93ce0ba3d2d7
equal deleted inserted replaced
416:c06a899bd1f0 417:d3b05641e7ca
   105 the free $C$-$C$-bimodule with one generator.)
   105 the free $C$-$C$-bimodule with one generator.)
   106 That is, $\HC_*(C\otimes C)$ is
   106 That is, $\HC_*(C\otimes C)$ is
   107 quasi-isomorphic to its $0$-th homology (which in turn, by \ref{item:hochschild-coinvariants}
   107 quasi-isomorphic to its $0$-th homology (which in turn, by \ref{item:hochschild-coinvariants}
   108 above, is just $C$) via the quotient map $\HC_0 \onto \HH_0$.
   108 above, is just $C$) via the quotient map $\HC_0 \onto \HH_0$.
   109 \end{enumerate}
   109 \end{enumerate}
   110 (Together, these just say that Hochschild homology is `the derived functor of coinvariants'.)
   110 (Together, these just say that Hochschild homology is ``the derived functor of coinvariants".)
   111 We'll first recall why these properties are characteristic.
   111 We'll first recall why these properties are characteristic.
   112 
   112 
   113 Take some $C$-$C$ bimodule $M$, and choose a free resolution
   113 Take some $C$-$C$ bimodule $M$, and choose a free resolution
   114 \begin{equation*}
   114 \begin{equation*}
   115 \cdots \to F_2 \xrightarrow{f_2} F_1 \xrightarrow{f_1} F_0.
   115 \cdots \to F_2 \xrightarrow{f_2} F_1 \xrightarrow{f_1} F_0.
   128 \cP_i(F_*) & \xrightarrow{\cP_i(\pi)} \cP_i(M) \\
   128 \cP_i(F_*) & \xrightarrow{\cP_i(\pi)} \cP_i(M) \\
   129 \intertext{and}
   129 \intertext{and}
   130 \cP_*(F_j) & \xrightarrow{\cP_0(F_j) \onto H_0(\cP_*(F_j))} \coinv(F_j).
   130 \cP_*(F_j) & \xrightarrow{\cP_0(F_j) \onto H_0(\cP_*(F_j))} \coinv(F_j).
   131 \end{align*}
   131 \end{align*}
   132 The cone of each chain map is acyclic.
   132 The cone of each chain map is acyclic.
   133 In the first case, this is because the `rows' indexed by $i$ are acyclic since $\cP_i$ is exact.
   133 In the first case, this is because the ``rows" indexed by $i$ are acyclic since $\cP_i$ is exact.
   134 In the second case, this is because the `columns' indexed by $j$ are acyclic, since $F_j$ is free.
   134 In the second case, this is because the ``columns" indexed by $j$ are acyclic, since $F_j$ is free.
   135 Because the cones are acyclic, the chain maps are quasi-isomorphisms.
   135 Because the cones are acyclic, the chain maps are quasi-isomorphisms.
   136 Composing one with the inverse of the other, we obtain the desired quasi-isomorphism
   136 Composing one with the inverse of the other, we obtain the desired quasi-isomorphism
   137 $$\cP_*(M) \quismto \coinv(F_*).$$
   137 $$\cP_*(M) \quismto \coinv(F_*).$$
   138 
   138 
   139 %If $M$ is free, that is, a direct sum of copies of
   139 %If $M$ is free, that is, a direct sum of copies of