text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex
changeset 405 2e1b1efbf928
parent 402 853376c08d76
child 417 d3b05641e7ca
--- a/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Sun Jun 27 13:41:43 2010 -0700
+++ b/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Sun Jun 27 19:04:53 2010 -0700
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 It may be useful to look at Figure \ref{fig:erectly-a-tent-badly} to help understand the arrangement. The red, blue and orange $2$-cells there correspond to the $m=0$, $m=1$ and $m=2$ terms respectively, while the $3$-cells (only one of each type is shown) correspond to the terms in the homotopy $h$.
 \begin{figure}[!ht]
 $$\mathfig{0.5}{smallblobs/tent}$$
-\caption{``Erecting a tent badly.'' We know where we want to send a simplex, and each of the iterated boundary components. However, these do not agree, and we need to stitch the pieces together. Note that these diagrams don't exactly match the situation in the text: a $k$-simplex has $k+1$ boundary components, while a $k$-blob has $k$ boundary terms.}
+\caption{``Erecting a tent badly.'' We know where we want to send a simplex, and each of the iterated boundary components. However, these do not agree, and we need to stitch the pieces together. Note that these diagrams don't exactly match the situation in the text: a $k$-simplex has $k+1$ boundary components, while a $k$-blob has $k$ boundary terms. \nn{turn upside?}}
 \label{fig:erectly-a-tent-badly}
 \end{figure}