text/ncat.tex
changeset 392 a7b53f6a339d
parent 390 027bfdae3098
child 393 0daa4983d229
equal deleted inserted replaced
391:9ace9a326c39 392:a7b53f6a339d
  1684 this is a version of the familiar algebras-bimodules-intertwiners $2$-category.
  1684 this is a version of the familiar algebras-bimodules-intertwiners $2$-category.
  1685 It is clearly appropriate to call an $S^0$ module a bimodule,
  1685 It is clearly appropriate to call an $S^0$ module a bimodule,
  1686 but this is much less true for higher dimensional spheres, 
  1686 but this is much less true for higher dimensional spheres, 
  1687 so we prefer the term ``sphere module" for the general case.
  1687 so we prefer the term ``sphere module" for the general case.
  1688 
  1688 
       
  1689 The results of this subsection are not needed for the rest of the paper,
       
  1690 so we will skimp on details in a couple of places.
       
  1691 
  1689 For simplicity, we will assume that $n$-categories are enriched over $\c$-vector spaces.
  1692 For simplicity, we will assume that $n$-categories are enriched over $\c$-vector spaces.
  1690 
  1693 
  1691 The $0$- through $n$-dimensional parts of $\cC$ are various sorts of modules, and we describe
  1694 The $0$- through $n$-dimensional parts of $\cS$ are various sorts of modules, and we describe
  1692 these first.
  1695 these first.
  1693 The $n{+}1$-dimensional part of $\cS$ consists of intertwiners
  1696 The $n{+}1$-dimensional part of $\cS$ consists of intertwiners
  1694 of (garden-variety) $1$-category modules associated to decorated $n$-balls.
  1697 of (garden-variety) $1$-category modules associated to decorated $n$-balls.
  1695 We will see below that in order for these $n{+}1$-morphisms to satisfy all of
  1698 We will see below that in order for these $n{+}1$-morphisms to satisfy all of
  1696 the duality requirements of an $n{+}1$-category, we will have to assume
  1699 the duality requirements of an $n{+}1$-category, we will have to assume
  1985 				z_{D\times I}(\psi_1(a_1\ot b_1)\bullet \psi_2(a_2\ot b_2)) .
  1988 				z_{D\times I}(\psi_1(a_1\ot b_1)\bullet \psi_2(a_2\ot b_2)) .
  1986 \]
  1989 \]
  1987 In other words, the inner product on $Y$ is determined by the inner products on
  1990 In other words, the inner product on $Y$ is determined by the inner products on
  1988 $Y_1$, $Y_2$ and $D\times I$.
  1991 $Y_1$, $Y_2$ and $D\times I$.
  1989 
  1992 
       
  1993 Now we show how to unambiguously identify $\cS(X; c; E)$ and $\cS(X; c; E')$ for any
       
  1994 two choices of $E$ and $E'$.
       
  1995 Consider first the case where $\bd X$ is decomposed as three $n$-balls $A$, $B$ and $C$,
       
  1996 with $E = \bd(A\cup B)$ and $E' = \bd A$.
       
  1997 We must provide an isomorphism between $\cS(X; c; E) = \hom(\cS(C), \cS(A\cup B))$
       
  1998 and $\cS(X; c; E') = \hom(\cS(C\cup \ol{B}), \cS(A))$.
       
  1999 Let $D = B\cap A$.
       
  2000 Then as above we can construct a map
       
  2001 \[
       
  2002 	\psi: \cS(B)\ot\cS(\ol{B}) \to \cS(D\times I) .
       
  2003 \]
       
  2004 Given $f\in \hom(\cS(C), \cS(A\cup B))$ we define $f'\in \hom(\cS(C\cup \ol{B}), \cS(A))$
       
  2005 to be the composition
       
  2006 \[
       
  2007 	\cS(C\cup \ol{B}) \stackrel{f\ot\id}{\longrightarrow}
       
  2008 		\cS(A\cup B\cup \ol{B})  \stackrel{\id\ot\psi}{\longrightarrow}
       
  2009 			\cS(A\cup(D\times I)) \stackrel{\cong}{\longrightarrow} \cS(A) .
       
  2010 \]
       
  2011 (See Figure xxxx.)
       
  2012 Let $D' = B\cap C$.
       
  2013 Using the inner products there is an adjoint map
       
  2014 \[
       
  2015 	\psi^\dagger: \cS(D'\times I) \to \cS(\ol{B})\ot\cS(B) .
       
  2016 \]
       
  2017 Given $f'\in \hom(\cS(C\cup \ol{B}), \cS(A))$ we define $f\in \hom(\cS(C), \cS(A\cup B))$
       
  2018 to be the composition
       
  2019 \[
       
  2020 	\cS(C) \stackrel{\cong}{\longrightarrow}
       
  2021 		\cS(C\cup(D'\times I)) \stackrel{\id\ot\psi^\dagger}{\longrightarrow}
       
  2022 			\cS(C\cup \ol{B}\cup B)   \stackrel{f'\ot\id}{\longrightarrow}
       
  2023 				\cS(A\cup B) .
       
  2024 \]
       
  2025 It is not hard too show that the above two maps are mutually inverse.
       
  2026 
       
  2027 \begin{lem}
       
  2028 Any two choices of $E$ and $E'$ are related by a series of modifications as above.
       
  2029 \end{lem}
       
  2030 
       
  2031 \begin{proof}
       
  2032 (Sketch)
       
  2033 $E$ and $E'$ are isotopic, and any isotopy is 
       
  2034 homotopic to a composition of small isotopies which are either
       
  2035 (a) supported away from $E$, or (b) modify $E$ in the simple manner described above.
       
  2036 \end{proof}
       
  2037 
       
  2038 It follows from the lemma that we can construct an isomorphism
       
  2039 between $\cS(X; c; E)$ and $\cS(X; c; E')$ for any pair $E$, $E'$.
       
  2040 This construction involves on a choice of simple ``moves" (as above) to transform
       
  2041 $E$ to $E'$.
       
  2042 We must now show that the isomorphism does not depend on this choice.
       
  2043 We will show below that it suffice to check two ``movie moves".
       
  2044 
       
  2045 The first movie move is to push $E$ across an $n$-ball $B$ as above, then push it back.
       
  2046 The result is equivalent to doing nothing.
       
  2047 As we remarked above, the isomorphisms corresponding to these two pushes are mutually
       
  2048 inverse, so we have invariance under this movie move.
       
  2049 
       
  2050 The second movie move replaces to successive pushes in the same direction,
       
  2051 across $B_1$ and $B_2$, say, with a single push across $B_1\cup B_2$.
       
  2052 (See Figure xxxx.)
       
  2053 Invariance under this movie move follows from the compatibility of the inner
       
  2054 product for $B_1\cup B_2$ with the inner products for $B_1$ and $B_2$.
       
  2055 
       
  2056 If $n\ge 2$, these two movie move suffice:
       
  2057 
       
  2058 \begin{lem}
       
  2059 Assume $n\ge 2$ and fix $E$ and $E'$ as above.
       
  2060 The any two sequences of elementary moves connecting $E$ to $E'$
       
  2061 are related by a sequence of the two movie moves defined above.
       
  2062 \end{lem}
       
  2063 
       
  2064 \begin{proof}
       
  2065 (Sketch)
       
  2066 Consider a two parameter family of diffeomorphisms (one parameter family of isotopies) 
       
  2067 of $\bd X$.
       
  2068 Up to homotopy,
       
  2069 such a family is homotopic to a family which can be decomposed 
       
  2070 into small families which are either
       
  2071 (a) supported away from $E$, 
       
  2072 (b) have boundaries corresponding to the two movie moves above.
       
  2073 Finally, observe that the space of $E$'s is simply connected.
       
  2074 (This fails for $n=1$.)
       
  2075 \end{proof}
       
  2076 
       
  2077 For $n=1$ we have to check an additional ``global" relations corresponding to 
       
  2078 rotating the 0-sphere $E$ around the 1-sphere $\bd X$.
       
  2079 \nn{should check this global move, or maybe cite Frobenius reciprocity result}
       
  2080 
  1990 \nn{...}
  2081 \nn{...}
  1991 
  2082 
  1992 \medskip
  2083 \medskip
  1993 \hrule
  2084 \hrule
  1994 \medskip
  2085 \medskip